Portfolio command center
See properties, units, occupancy, rent, and operational health from one place without losing the details.
Tenaro gives operators one calm command layer for leases, maintenance, vendors, and payments — then provisions each customer instance deliberately, not sloppily.
We review each request, provision the instance manually, and keep the handoff tight. No self-serve wizard to break things.
Built for property operators who want a tidy operational system instead of a pile of disconnected tools and spreadsheets.
See properties, units, occupancy, rent, and operational health from one place without losing the details.
Keep the financial and document trail attached to the right unit, lease, and tenant record.
Route requests, assign vendors, and track job status with a practical audit trail.
Owners, tenants, and vendors each get the view they need, not a giant generic dashboard.
Tenaro is a good fit for owner-operators, smaller teams, and growing portfolios that need a professional system before they need enterprise bloat.
Right now, a trial request is a lead for a dedicated Tenaro instance. We review it, provision the environment manually, and follow up with the next step instead of pretending there is a one-click signup that does not exist yet.
Simple enough to convert, honest enough to ship.
Share the basics: who you are, portfolio size, timeline, and what you want to solve. The form writes to the machine in a durable SQLite table.
The lead is visible to the admin workflow. We can mark it as reviewed, approved, or provisioned once the instance is created.
Once the instance exists, we can create the first owner account and onboard tenants, vendors, or managers in a controlled way.
When automated provisioning is worth it, we add templates, queues, DNS, secrets, billing, and instance lifecycle tooling.
For v1, the honest offer is a private trial with manual setup. That keeps the launch tasteful and avoids fake self-serve promises.
Private trial, manual provisioning, onboarding help, and direct follow-up. This is the right shape for the first real customer conversation.
Once the demand is real, the next pricing layer can be tied to the provisioning model rather than guessed at today.
No. The positioning is private instance first. We collect leads, review them, and provision the workspace deliberately instead of stuffing everyone into one sandbox.
The target is one business day for the initial review. Because setup is manual in v1, follow-up is human and honest.
Yes. The form asks for portfolio size because a small pilot is often the right way to validate the fit before scaling.
That is a v2 project. It needs templates, a queue, secrets handling, per-instance config, DNS automation, billing hooks, and admin tooling. Better to build that once the demand is proven.